MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387824746 · doi:10.1353/his.2019.a910551

Memory from Below: Emma Goldman, Counter-Monuments, and the Politics of Public Memory

2023· article· fr· W4387824746 on OpenAlex
Angela Shpolberg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnarchism and Radical Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPublicsArtPoliticsPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deux lieux de commémoration publics dédiés à Emma Goldman (1869-1940), une féministe radicale et pionnière, sont examinés dans le cadre d’une discussion plus large sur la préservation de la mémoire collective féministe. Goldman était une anarchiste de renom qui défendait les droits des femmes, les droits des travailleurs et la liberté d’expression. Tout au long de sa vie, elle s’est entretenue avec le mouvement américain pour le droit de vote des femmes — et a été l’une des rares voix critiques à pousser le mouvement vers des positions toujours plus progressistes émanant de la gauche. La mise en contraste des formes traditionnelles de commémoration et des « contre-monuments » conçus par des artistes et érigés spontanément par ses admirateurs nous permet d’explorer les effets de ces lieux commémoratifs sur les formes que peut prendre la mémoire publique et sur les enjeux liés à ces choix formels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.016
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it