Mulco: Recognizing Chinese Nested Named Entities through Multiple Scopes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nested Named Entity Recognition (NNER), as a subarea of Named Entity Recognition, has presented longstanding challenges to researchers. In NNER, one entity may be part of a larger entity, which can occur at multiple levels. These nested structures prevent traditional sequence labeling methods from properly recognizing all entities. While recent research has focused on designing better recognition methods for NNER in various languages, Chinese Nested Named Entity Recognition (CNNER) is still underdeveloped, largely due to a lack of freely available CNNER benchmarks. To support CNNER research, in this paper, we introduce ChiNesE, a CNNER dataset comprising 20,000 sentences from online passages in multiple domains and containing 117,284 entities that fall into 10 categories, of which 43.8% are nested named entities. Based on ChiNesE, we propose Mulco, a novel method that can recognize named entities in nested structures through multiple scopes. Each scope uses a scope-based sequence labeling method that predicts an anchor and the length of a named entity to recognize it. Experimental results show that Mulco outperforms state-of-the-art baseline methods with different recognition schemes on ChiNesE and ACE 2005 Chinese corpus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".