Mudanças no campo da saúde e impactos para a psicologia Cambios en el área de la salud e impactos para la psicología Changes in the health field and impacts on psychology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No final do século XX a discussão sobre promoção da saúde foi retomada em uma série de Conferências Internacionais sobre Saúde que ocorreram no Canadá, Estados Unidos e países da Europa Ocidental. Por essas conferências, o conceito de promoção da saúde, até então considerado um dos níveis de prevenção primária, se expandiu, ampliando a concepção do processo saúde-doença e de seus determinantes, propondo a articulação de saberes técnicos e populares e a mobilização de recursos institucionais e comunitários, públicos e privados para seu enfrentamento e resolução. À reformulação do conceito correspondem mudanças epistemológicas, políticas e técnicas em diferentes saberes e profissões. O objetivo deste trabalho é apontar alguns desses impactos para a Psicologia. Al final del siglo XX la discusión sobre promoción de la salud se ha reanudado en una serie de Conferencias Internacionales sobre Salud que tuvieron lugar en Canadá, Estados Unidos y países de Europa Occidental. Desde estas conferencias, el concepto de promoción de la salud, hasta entonces considerado uno de los niveles de prevención primaria, se expandió, ampliando la concepción del proceso salud-enfermedad y de sus determinantes, proponiendo la articulación de saberes técnicos y populares y la movilización de recursos institucionales y comunitarios, públicos y privados para su enfrentamiento y resolución. A la reformulación del concepto corresponden cambios epistemológicos, políticos y técnicos en diferentes saberes y profesiones. El propósito de este trabajo es señalar algunos de esos impactos para la Psicología. In the late twentieth century, the discussion about health promotion was resumed in a series of International Health Conferences which took place in Canada, The United States and West Europe. From these conferences, the concept of health promotion, hitherto considered as one of the primary levels of prevention, expanded the conception of health-disease process as well as its determinants. It was also proposed not only the link technical and popular knowledge, but also the mobilization of institution and community resources, both public and private, for its confrontation and resolution. To the reformulation of the concept corresponds epistemological, political and technical changes, in different kinds of knowledge and professions. The goal of this work is to point out some of these impacts on psychology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".