MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387858302 · doi:10.7759/cureus.47476

Sex Determination Using Frontal Sinus Diameters on Direct Radiography

2023· article· en· W4387858302 on OpenAlexaff
Emre Emekli

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsSAIT Polytechnic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFrontal sinusRadiographyNuclear medicineRadiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The shape and developmental stages of the frontal sinus (FS) differ in each individual, it can be used to determine sex and identity. This study aimed to assess the morphological structure of the FS diameters in sex determination using posterioanterior (AP) skull radiography. This data can be valuable for identifying and characterizing human features. METHODS: The study included 350 patients (171 females, 179 males) aged between 20 and 55 years who underwent AP skull radiography. FSs were classified as symmetrical, asymmetrical, unilateral, or bilateral aplasic. The right and left FS height and width measurements were made based on the largest diameters. RESULTS: The mean age was 32.8±11.45 years for the whole sample. The mean age of the males was 31.23±11.9 (20-51) years and that of the females was 34.45±10.75 (20-55) years. When classified anatomically, 20 patients had bilateral aplasia (12 males, eight females), 19 patients had right aplasia (10 males, nine females), and 11 patients had left aplasia (seven males, four females). FS was symmetrical in 206 (72.1%) patients while right dominance was observed in 33 (9.43%) patients and left dominance in 61 (17.43%) patients. The FS height and width values on both sides ​​were statistically significantly higher in males than in females (p<0.001 for each parameter). The females were accurately classified at a rate of 71.2% and the males at 68.2%. CONCLUSION: Notably, our research has revealed that frontal sinus diameters are consistently larger in males than in females, and that direct radiography can be employed for gender determination with an accuracy rate of 69.7%. This information underscores the utility of morphometric evaluation of the frontal sinus diameters on direct radiography for gender and identity determination, potentially in conjunction with other parameters. In conclusion, our study has demonstrated the potential of the morphological structure of the frontal sinuses as a valuable tool for identifying and characterizing human individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207