MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387860487 · doi:10.1002/pra2.995

Health Information Use of Older Adults with Diabetes: A Preliminary Analysis

2023· article· en· W4387860487 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoqian Zhang, Joan C. Bartlett

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisPandemicContext (archaeology)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GerontologyPsychologyMedicineDiabetes mellitusQualitative researchDiseaseSociologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This poster presents research investigating the health information use of older adults with diabetes in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Data were collected using semi‐structured interviews and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results‐to‐date showed self‐reported changes in using health information during the pandemic; that is, some participants endeavored to protect themselves during the pandemic, they carefully made health‐related decisions, and they had a challenging time following their caregivers' suggestions (e.g., taking medicine and exercising) even though they knew they should. However, other participants reported no changes during the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.011
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologySame topicHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207