MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387868866 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1320101

Editorial: Exercise intervention for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes

2023· editorial· en· W4387868866 on OpenAlexaff
Céline Aguer, Smiti Snigdha, Lauren M. Sparks

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaInstitut du Savoir Montfort
FundersSociété Francophone du Diabète
KeywordsType 2 diabetesMedicineExercise physiologyIntervention (counseling)Physical therapyDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editorial on the Research Topic Exercise intervention for prevention and management of type 2 diabetes More than half a billion people are living with diabetes worldwide, and almost all global cases (96%) are type 2 diabetes (T2D).With that number projected to more than double to 1.3 billion people in the next 30 years, the need for effective pharmacological and nonpharmacological prevention and treatment strategies is unmet and dire.Obesity and physical inactivity (i.e., sedentary lifestyle) are two significant risk factors for the development and progression of T2D.The molecular mechanisms driving the disease onset and progression in distinct peripheral tissues, as well as their cross-talk, remain unclear.In addition to pharmacological treatments such as glucose-lowering medications (e.g., metformin, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) agonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, etc.), physical activity and structured exercise (exercise) are well-known therapeutic strategies for both prevention and management of T2D.Comparatively, adherence is high for medication use, while exercise adherence is often low for a variety of reasons such as lack of time, pain, costs, lack of expected results, thus making it difficult to prescribe physical activity alone or in combination with pharmacotherapy to patients with T2D.In recent years, the exercise physiology field has shifted its focus toward finding the type of exercise training that could improve adherence and answer the question of "how little can I do?"For example, replacing longer moderate intensity aerobic exercise bouts with shorter and more intense exercises such as those practiced in high intensity exercise training (HIIT) has yielded promising results.This area of research requires further investigations in larger and more diverse cohorts to reach the goal of prescribing the optimal program for individuals with T2D that will not only manage their symptoms but also promote lifetime adherence.In this Research Topic, we aimed to shed more light on how decreasing sedentary time and/or increasing structured exercise training-either alone or in combination with diet or pharmacotherapy-aids in the management of T2D at the molecular, cellular, and physiological levels with the ultimate goal of finding new avenues to help individuals with T2D manage their disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0120.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207