MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Variational Inference-Based Channel Estimation for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Aided Wireless Systems

2023· article· en· W4387869947 on OpenAlexafffund
Firas Fredj, Amal Feriani, Amine Mezghani, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaximum a posteriori estimationChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceTelecommunications linkAlgorithmFadingGaussianPosterior probabilityMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMaximum likelihoodTelecommunicationsStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a variational inference-based channel estimation method in fully passive reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided mmWave single-user single-input multiple-output (SIMO) communication systems. The main goal is to jointly estimate the user equipment (UE)-to-RIS (UE-RIS) and RIS-to-base station (RIS-BS) channels using uplink training signals in a passive RIS setup. Specifically, by using a variational inference framework, we approximate the posterior of the channels with convenient distributions given the received uplink training signals. The parameters of the approximated distributions are generated by deep neural networks trained using variational loss functions derived using a lower bound on the log-likelihood of the received signal. Then, the learned distributions, which are close to the true posterior distributions in terms of Kullback Leibler divergence, are leveraged to obtain the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation of the UE-RIS and RIS-BS channels. We evaluate the proposed channel estimation solution under two channel priors. The first channel prior models Rayleigh fading channels with Gaussian prior, whereas the second one represents sparse channels in the angular domain with Laplace prior. The simulation results demonstrate that MAP channel estimates using the approximated posteriors yield a capacity which is close to the one achieved with the true posteriors, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207