MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fast Cycle Multiple Entry PBFT Consensus

2023· article· en· W4387870145 on OpenAlexaff
Jelena Mišić, Vojislav B. Mišić, Elham Amini, Zahra Mohtajollah, Xiaolin Chang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsByzantine fault toleranceComputer scienceProbabilistic logicDistributed computingBlockchainConsensus algorithmThe InternetScheme (mathematics)Fault toleranceComputer securityAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) is widely used despite its limitations. In this paper we extend a previously described multiple entry version of PBFT with fast cycle capability. In this approach, multiple data blocks are proposed by different nodes or replicas, but instead of choosing only one to undergo the consensus procedure, replicas collect and order the proposals which are then accepted through a simplified consensus cycle. We analyze the operation of this scheme using a probabilistic model and show that consensus performance actually improves over that of the original PBFT as the traffic load increases. In this manner, the proposed scheme appears to be well suited for blockchain-based Internet of Things (IoT) applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207