MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Age-Critical LEC-CFDP Scheme for Dual-Hop Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks

2023· article· en· W4387870467 on OpenAlexaff
Jianhao Huang, Jian Jiao, Ye Wang, Shaohua Wu, Rongxing Lu, Qinyu Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetransmissionNetwork packetComputer scienceLatency (audio)Computer networkAlgorithmReal-time computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The upcoming space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) can provide status updates relaying for ground user equipment (UEs). However, the SAGIN cannot utilize traditional hybrid automatic retransmission request (HARQ) for reliable transmission due to the high bit error rate (BER) and long propagation latency. In this paper, we propose the age-critical long erasure code-CCSDS file delivery protocol (LEC-CFDP) schemes with the metric of age of information (AoI) to realize timely status updates in dual-hop SAGIN. We first propose the uniform LEC-CFDP (U-LEC-CFDP), where the UE and satellite can uniformly insert one LEC packet in every$(L-1)$information packets, and the receiver can utilize the LEC packet to recover the lost packets and avoid retransmission. Moreover, the satellite can immediately forward the successively recovered information packets to the destination, named U-LEC-i CFDP, and a close-form expression of peak AoI (PAoI) for the U-LEC-i CFDP is derived. To further improve PAoI, we model a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) problem to analyse optimal$L$for our dynamic LEC-i CFDP (D-LEC-i CFDP), and design an effective Point-based Informed Bound (PIB) algorithm to update optimal$L$. Simulation results show that the D-LEC-i CFDP scheme can lower the expected end-to-end delay and PAoI in comparison with U-LEC-CFDP schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207