Ultrasonic Index Modulation With Spread Spectrum for Intra-Body Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasonic intra-body communication (IBC) is an emerging technique to enable revolutionary healthcare applications. This paper proposes an ultrasonic index modulation with spread spectrum (UsIM-SS) scheme for IBCs. The information bits consist of modulation bits and index bits. The core idea of UsIM-SS is that the modulation bits are spread by spreading codes and the index bits are leveraged to select the time-hoping sequence to transmit the spreading bits. We also find that the existing ultrasonic wideband (UsWB) and UsIM can be regarded as special cases of the proposed UsIM-SS. Furthermore, the soft decision-based maximum likelihood (S-ML) receiver and hard decision-based ML (H-ML) receiver are proposed for UsIM-SS, providing a trade-off between bit-error rate (BER) and complexity. Theoretical spectrum efficiency (SE) and BER expressions for UsIM-SS using S-ML and H-ML are also derived and verified by extensive Monte Carlo simulations. Both theoretical and simulation results show that UsIM-SS can achieve lower BER and higher SE than existing UsWB and Us 1M techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".