MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Communication-Efficient Multi-Agent Actor-Critic Framework for Distributed Optimization of Resource Allocation in V2X Networks

2023· article· en· W4387870817 on OpenAlexaff
Nessrine Hammami, Kim Khoa Nguyen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningQuality of serviceResource allocationDistributed computingResource management (computing)Computer networkController (irrigation)Resource (disambiguation)Scheme (mathematics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vehicular communication technology has enabled new services for drivers and passengers with different Quality of Service (QoS) demands. Due to network resource limitation, a cooperative resource allocation scheme between Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) links and Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) links is needed. In literature, the resource allocation problem can be solved using a cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework. Such framework can be implemented in a central controller that receives observations and rewards of all agents, and then calculates the action for each agent accordingly. However, such a central controller may not be realistic for a vehicular network which is highly flexible and requires real-time decision making. Therefore, decentralized schemes where the agents exchange messages to maximize their average rewards would be more appropriate. Nevertheless, decentralized training increases communication costs among the agents, which is a challenging issue for a vehicular network with limited communication bandwidth. This paper proposes an Attentional Double Hierarchical Advantage Actor-Critic (ADHA2C) to address this issue. Specifically, ADHA2C adopts an attention mechanism added to the actor part to classify the important messages sent from other agents in the network. Our extensive experiments and analysis show that the proposed method approximates the performance of the upper bound model, and disturbance in the learning phase can be avoided through our proposed attention mechanism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207