MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Historical Institutionalism in Education and Globalization

2023· book-chapter· en· W4387872015 on OpenAlexaff
Lukas Graf

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationNexus (standard)Vocational educationHistorical institutionalismGermanInstitutionalismPolitical sciencePerspective (graphical)Path dependenceEconomic globalizationEconomic systemSociologyEconomic geographyPolitical economyEconomicsNeoclassical economicsPoliticsGeographyLawEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Historical new institutionalism (HI) emphasizes the relevance of temporal sequences, path dependencies, and critical junctures in the study of institutional change. Through this lens, globalization is typically analyzed in terms of how it is related to distinct national trajectories of institutional development. This chapter first presents key concepts of HI and its contributions linked to the study of education, training, and globalization. It then outlines how the historical-institutional analysis of globalization pressures is linked to different modes of change. Next, the chapter offers a case study of recent reforms in the German vocational education and training sector related to global educational expansion and academization. Findings include that in this sector the main pattern of gradual institutional change is layering, implying that new institutions are added on top of existing ones. The conclusion discusses the proposed sectoral HI perspective as well as prospects for further research at the nexus of HI, education, and globalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.028
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207