A case of hyperlysinemia identified by urine newborn screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hyperlysinemia is a rare autosomal recessive deficiency of 2‐aminoadipic semialdehyde synthase (AASS) affecting the initial step in lysine degradation. It is thought to be a benign biochemical abnormality, but reports on cases remain scarce. The description of additional cases, in particular, those identified without ascertainment bias, may help counseling of new cases in the future. It may also help to establish the risks associated with pharmacological inhibition of AASS, a potential therapeutic strategy that is under investigation for other inborn errors of lysine degradation. We describe the identification of a hyperlysinemia case identified in the Provincial Neonatal Urine Screening Program in Sherbrooke, Quebec. This case presented with a profile of cystinuria but with a very high increase in urinary lysine. A diagnosis of hyperlysinemia was confirmed through biochemical testing and the identification of biallelic variants in AASS. The p.R146W and p.T371I variants are novel and affect the folding of the lysine‐2‐oxoglutarate domain of AASS. The 11‐month‐old boy is currently doing well without any therapeutic interventions. The identification of this case through newborn urine screening further establishes that hyperlysinemia is a biochemical abnormality with limited clinical consequences and may not require any intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".