MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387884016 · doi:10.23977/jeeem.2023.060507

Optimization Design of a Solar Mirror Field Based on an Optimization Model

2023· article· en· W4387884016 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenkai Jia, Yinlong Yang, Liangzhou Tian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energySolar energyThermal energy storageUSableSolar powerConcentrated solar powerContext (archaeology)Zero-energy buildingComputer scienceElectricityPhotovoltaic systemEnergy storageElectricity generationGrid parityEnvironmental scienceStand-alone power systemArchitectural engineeringProcess engineeringPower (physics)Distributed generationElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMultimedia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar thermal power generation is an advanced and environmentally friendly clean energy technology of the 21st century. It harnesses solar energy to produce electricity by concentrating sunlight to create high-temperature environments, converting this heat energy into usable thermal energy, and then transforming it into electrical energy. This makes it suitable for meeting basic electricity needs, especially in the context of renewable energy integration and energy storage. However, solar tower power plants also face several challenges, including high construction and maintenance costs, dependence on geographical location and weather conditions, and energy storage issues. Additionally, they often require extensive land use and cannot generate power continuously during cloudy conditions or at night. This paper delves into discussions and research on how to address these two aspects of the problem, leveraging the power of mathematical modeling for practical problem solving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electrotechnology Electrical Engineering and ManagementSame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207