MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387885854 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2023.3326863

Acceleration-Based Kalman Tracking for Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging In Vivo

2023· article· en· W4387885854 on OpenAlexaff
B. K. Huang, Jipeng Yan, Megan A. Morris, Victoria Sinnett, Navita Somaiah, Meng‐Xing Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersMedical Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchChina Scholarship CouncilImperial College LondonCancer Research UKChan Zuckerberg Initiative
KeywordsAccelerationComputer scienceKalman filterComputer visionTracking (education)Frame rateInterpolation (computer graphics)Artificial intelligenceImage resolutionTemporal resolutionFrame (networking)PhysicsMotion (physics)OpticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Super-resolution ultrasound (SRUS) can image microvascular structure and flow at subwave-diffraction resolution based on localizing and tracking microbubbles (MBs). Currently, tracking MBs accurately under limited imaging frame rates and high MB concentrations remains a challenge, especially under the effect of cardiac pulsatility and in highly curved vessels. In this study, an acceleration-incorporated MB motion model is introduced into a Kalman tracking framework. The tracking performance was evaluated using simulated microvasculature with different MB motion parameters, concentrations, and acquisition frame rates, and in vivo human breast tumor US datasets. The simulation results show that the acceleration-based method outperformed the nonacceleration-based method at different levels of acceleration and acquisition frame rates and achieved significant improvement in true positive rate (TPR; up to 11.3%) and false negative rate (FNR; up to 13.2%). The proposed method can also reduce errors in vasculature reconstruction via the acceleration-based nonlinear interpolation, compared with linear interpolation (up to [Formula: see text]). The tracking results from temporally downsampled low frame rate in vivo datasets from human breast tumors show that the proposed method has better MB tracking performance than the baseline method, if using results from the initial high frame data as a reference. Finally, the acceleration estimated from tracking results also provides a spatial speed gradient map that may contain extra valuable diagnostic information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207