Bibliographic record
Abstract
The musical artistic proposals of the20th and 21st centuries have incorporatedall kinds of sounds into artisticactions, changing the perception of thework of art, and fostering a new way oflistening to the environment. The universeof sound has expanded enormouslyand artistic practices have opened up tonew realities, emerging technologies andconceptions of global and open listening.In this article we analyze the sound resourcesof some essential proposals inthe sound journey of the 20th and 21stcenturies. In the first place, the figure ofa Spanish inventor and visionary, JoséAntonio García Castillejo, el Cura Castillejo,as the absolute forerunner of electronicmusic with his electro composerdevice, and his visionary conceptions ofmusic and art. Second, the proposals ofJohn Cage. Third, the ideas of MurrayShafer in Canada and his Soundscape.Fourth, the genius of Llorenç Barber inSpain, to finally end with the conceptionof artistic research by Alex Arteaga.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".