MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387890770

The Renewable Energy Sources of the «Green» Economy – a Modern Global Trend

2017· article· en· W4387890770 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shuba Olena А.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyGreen economyEconomicsNatural resource economicsEconomyBusinessPolitical scienceSustainable developmentEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is aimed at studying the current status of use of the renewable energy sources in the selected regions of the world. The current status of use of the renewable energy sources (hydro, solar, and wind) in the electricity generation in Europe, CIS, Asia and Africa has been analyzed. It has been noted that in the European countries the renewable energy sources dominate in the overall electricity generation. Also the problem of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion has been considered. The States with the highest values include China, the United States, India, Russia, Japan, Germany, Iran, the Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, and Canada. On generalizing the goals of the «green» economy as proposed by scientists, it has been defined that all of them envisage the creation of a fundamentally new environment for economic and social progress that would minimize negative impacts on the environment and, finally, would provide the efficient use of natural resources to raise the standard of living of population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207