MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387898299 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2023.071413

Research on SPOC Based Blended Teaching of College English under the Epidemic

2023· article· en· W4387898299 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peng Liu, Zhisong Fu, Jie Yáng

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEducation Department of Hainan Province
KeywordsCollege EnglishMathematics educationChinaThe InternetTeaching methodOnline teachingComputer scienceTeaching and learning centerBlended learningTeaching englishEducational technologyPsychologyPolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the impact and impact of the epidemic, China's education and teaching model has undergone tremendous changes. China has actively improved its online teaching system, created a series of online education and teaching software, actively advocated online teaching, and actively carried out college English teaching activities using internet platforms. After the end of the epidemic, universities gradually resumed offline teaching. This article is based on the research on SPOC's blended teaching of college English under the epidemic situation. By analyzing the overview of SPOC's model, we understand the impact of SPOC's blended teaching of college English on teaching effectiveness, propose the problems and countermeasures of SPOC's blended teaching of college English, provide specific teaching implementation strategies, and promote educational reform and development, to provide reference value for relevant educators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicEducational Technology and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207