MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387901257 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.678

Community Health Workers in Spain: a missing strategy to tackle hepatitis in migrant populations

2023· article· en· W4387901257 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Camila A Picchio, Ángel López Nicolás

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth equityHealth carePopulationEquity (law)MedicineHealth educationCommunity health workersHealth policyCommunity healthEnvironmental healthEconomic growthNursingPublic healthPolitical scienceHealth services

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Community health workers (CHWs) are health care providers which live and serve in the community and are responsible for the provision of health education to their communities, promoting healthy habits and lifestyles, diagnosing common illnesses, and encouraging the use of health services by linking people to health services. CHW programmes have been formally included as part of national health systems in many low- and middle-income countries (e.g., Ethiopia or Brazil), along with some high-income countries (e.g., Canada). Despite the major contribution CHWs have proven to make in health systems globally, Spain has yet to introduce a law acknowledging their role in the health system. The introduction of CHWs allows for the decentralization of health services and their extension beyond the regular forms of health service delivery (e.g. primary health centres or hospitals) as additional strategies for equity and person-centred care. CHWs have the capacity to reach underserved and vulnerable populations, including marginalized populations, which often encounter barriers to engage with their health systems. Migrant communities in Spain are an example of communities which are often marginalized and struggle to have their health needs met through their host health system. For instance, studies have reported a significantly higher prevalence of chronic infection of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) among migrants in comparison to the general Spanish population and late presentation to care in this population has been reported. CHWs have the potential to reach these underserved communities and provide culturally and linguistically appropriate health information, emphasizing the importance of HBV prevention, management and treatment, and vaccination. Ultimately, CHWs can offer decentralized and accessible health care and lead in co-creation processes for effective viral hepatitis - including HBV vaccination- services in community spaces and facilitate linkage to higher levels of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→