MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387901737 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.022

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Well-Being of Middle-Aged and Older Adults from 27 European Countries: Evidence from a Longitudinal Analysis of Population-Based Surveys

2023· article· en· W4387901737 on OpenAlexaff
Piotr Wilk, Sarah Cuschieri

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicDemographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineGerontologyLongitudinal studyPopulationLatent class modelStructural equation modelingEnvironmental healthDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Containment and restriction measures introduced during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic have had a negative effect on the health and well-being of individuals, regardless of whether or not they were infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We assessed how the pandemic impacted the overall well-being of middle-aged and older adults residing in 27 European countries. In particular, we assessed how having COVID-19 illness or experiencing symptoms associated with Long COVID impacted change in the level of well-being. Methods We used data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe's Corona Surveys collected in 2020 and 2021. The sample consisted of 47,964 respondents aged 50 years and older. The outcome variable was the across-time change in the repeated measures of well-being which were operationalized as two latent variables. We used structural equation modeling techniques (i.e., latent change score models) to assess the effects of the relevant risk factors (demographics, socio-economic, chronic conditions, social support) on change in the level of well-being. Results Overall, 8% or respondents were infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and 73% of those who were infected reported at least one persistent symptom associated with Long COVID. The results from the analyses indicate that individuals who were affected by COVID-19 illness had a significantly larger decline in the level of well-being than those not affected by this illness and that this decline was more pronounced among those who had Long COVID. We also observed that the degree of change in the level of well-being was associated with the risk factors. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the well-being of Europeans and its effects were more pronounced among those directly affected by COVID-19 illness. However, the magnitude of this effect differed across sub-groups of individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFrench-language works237,207