MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387906020 · doi:10.18332/ejm/172463

Strengthening the maternal-newborn quality of care during and beyond the Covid-19 pandemic - Findings from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Greece

2023· article· en· W4387906020 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Antigoni Sarantaki, Dimitra Metalinou, Aikaterini Lykeridou, Kleanthi Gourounti, Maria Dagla, Christina Nanou, Athina Diamanti, Evangelia Antoniou, Victoria Vivilaki, Stavroula Barbounaki, Stefano Delle Vedove, Ilaria Mariani, Arianna Bomben, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Marzia Lazzerini, IMAgiNE EURO study group

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Midwifery · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentrum fÖr Personcentrerad VårdStockholms Läns LandstingSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaInstitut National d'assurance Maladie-InvaliditéVlaamse regeringPetroleum Technology Development FundHellenic Foundation for Research and InnovationHaute école Spécialisée de Suisse OccidentaleVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVGöteborgs UniversitetTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma KurumuCity, University of LondonVetenskapsrådetLaerdal Foundation for Acute MedicineSuomalainen Lääkäriseura DuodecimAmasya ÜniversitesiKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseKarolinska InstitutetOpetushallitusEuropean CommissionUK Research and InnovationInnovationsfondenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungFinska LäkaresällskapetRoyal College of Midwives
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakQuality (philosophy)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PsychologyPolitical scienceHistoryMedicineVirologyOutbreakPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

is an open access and double-blind peer-reviewed scientific journal, that encompasses all aspects of the practice of midwifery, especially focused on midwifery research, support, care and advice during pregnancy, labour and the postpartum period.The overall aim of the journal is to foster, promote and disseminate research involving midwifery education and clinical practice.While the journal is European, it warmly welcomes and publishes submissions and content from all over the world, linking the global community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of MidwiferySame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207