MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387906314 · doi:10.1515/9783111330242-002

I Introduction: The making of a documentary corpus

2023· book-chapter· en· W4387906314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Said Aljoumani, Zahir Bhalloo, Konrad Hirschler

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The making of a documentary corpusThe Ḥaram al-sharīf corpus from Jerusalem with its 980 documents is a collection of outstanding importance for the history of pre-Ottoman Western Asia.As will be discussed below, numerous editions have been undertaken and these documents have proven to be of pivotal importance, especially for the field of Mamluk Studies.Yet how and when these documents converged into a single corpus is still largely unexplored.Even its (scholarly) discovery, which began in the 1970s, has been a convoluted process.The first batch of documents came to light in August 1974 and some two years later, in October 1976, another, larger batch was discovered.65The present work is the catalogue of a third batch of these documents that was discovered in the late 1990s.The first two batches, catalogued by Donald Little in his 1984 Catalogue of the Islamic Documents from al-Ḥaram aš-Šarîf in Jerusalem, came to light in rather undramatic circumstances; they were simply lying in the drawers of modern display cases in the Islamic Museum on the Ḥaram al-sharīf.As described in this catalogue's preface, the main protagonists in the bringing of the documents to the attention of the scholarly community in the late 1970s and early 1980s were Amal Abul-Hajj, Linda Northrup and Donald Little.66Of particular importance for the subsequent scholarly work were the black and white photographs of the documents taken by Martin Lyons in 1978.These photographs were subsequently microfilmed and made available to the wider community to serve as the basis for almost all publications in the next decades.67Yet notes accompanying the documents show that they had in fact already been 'discovered' at least once before the 1970s: A member of the museum staff must have started to work on some documents before the 1970s as is evident from notes on papers that have regrettably since been lost.68Unfortuntely for researchers, who love narratives of discovery, the third batch (or new corpus) described in this catalogue was found (or rather identified) in a similarly unspectacular location: the cupboard of an office in the museum.Even though this new corpus came to light in the late 1990s, its documents have thus far hardly played a role in scholarship and the mere fact of its existence was not known 65 Little, Catalogue, 1984, 1. 66 Northrup/Abul-Hajj, Collection of Medieval Arabic Documents; Little, Catalogue.On Donald Little see the volume dedicated to his memory, Massoud, Studies in Islamic Historiography.67 The 1978-set was deposited at McGill University and most editions until well into the 2010s de facto relied on (microfilm) copies of these images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207