MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387911774 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.909

Transnational prenatal care among migrant women giving birth in Montreal, Canada

2023· article· en· W4387911774 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa Merry, Ye Na Kim, Marcelo L. Urquía, Julie Goulet, Sarah Fredsted Villadsen, Andrée Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityManitoba HealthUniversity of ManitobaCentres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services SociauxUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLogistic regressionMaternity carePrenatal carePregnancyHealth careDemographyCross-sectional studyFamily medicineEnvironmental healthPopulationPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Given the number of barriers that migrant women confront while accessing maternity care in receiving countries, it is expected that they may engage in and rely on transnational healthcare to maintain their health and well-being during pregnancy. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and identify predictors of transnational prenatal care (TPC) (i.e., prenatal care from a healthcare professional in more than one country) among migrant women from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) who gave birth in Montreal, Canada. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis (n = 2595 women) using data from the Migrant-Friendly Maternity Care (MFMC) - Montreal project. The MFMC study used a cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from recently-arrived (< 8 years) migrant women from LMICs via medical record review and interview-administration of the MFMC questionnaire postpartum during the period of March 2014-January 2015 in three hospitals, and February-June 2015 in one hospital. We used logistic regression modelling to identify socio-demographic, migration, health, and perceptions of care variables significantly associated to TPC (referent group were women who only received prenatal care in Canada). Results Four percent of women reported receiving TPC. Sixty-one percent of TPC women were from the Middle East/North Africa (vs. 42% among no-TPC women); top source countries were Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Lebanon, Egypt and Iran. Predictors of TPC included: ‘Not living with the father of the baby’ (AOR = 4.8, 95%CI 2.4, 9.8), ‘having negative perceptions of pregnancy care in Canada (general experiences)’ (AOR = 1.2, 95%CI 1.1, 1.3) and younger maternal age (AOR = 1.1, 95%CI 1.0, 1.1). Conclusions Migrant women may be motivated to return to the home country for healthcare during pregnancy due to a need for family and social support and/or to overcome access barriers and negative pregnancy care experiences in the receiving country. Key messages • To reduce the potential for harm and to ensure a continuity of care, healthcare providers should inquire about care, support and other services received outside of the country during pregnancy. • Migrant women seeking care in their home country may address inadequacies regarding support and cultural preferences in prenatal care delivered in the receiving-country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207