Tendencias didácticas en los textos colombianos para enseñar filosofía en Bachillerato (1994-2003)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este texto presenta los resultados de una investigación realizada en la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional durante el primer semestre de 2018. El objetivo principal de la investigación consistió en identificar las tendencias didácticas de los textos editados en Colombia para la enseñanza de la filosofía en bachillerato durante la década 1994-2003. Desde el método de análisis de contenido, se identificaron las tendencias didácticas y se evaluaron los recursos didácticos como las imágenes, las citas textuales, las redes conceptuales, etc. Los resultados muestran dos tendencias didácticas: primero, la pedagogía tradicional y el constructivismo son los modelos pedagógicos predominantes; segundo, la mayoría de libros tratan que el estudiante establezca relaciones entre la filosofía y el contexto sociocultural colombiano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it