RELATIONSHIP OF TYPE D PERSONALITY AND ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction. Major psychosocial risk factors for acute myocardial infarction include depression, anxiety (various anxiety syndromes and disorders), pessimistic D personality type, work and family stress, anger/hostility, lack of social support, and low socioeconomic status. There are few studies evaluating the association between psychological factors and myocardial infarction. Aim. The aim of the study was to study the relationship of personality type D with the development of endothelial dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Material and methods. The study included 158 patients, mean age 58.2±2.5 years, who were admitted to the hospital for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The diagnosis was established according to the clinical guidelines of the Russian Society of Cardiology, 2020. In addition to the traditional clinical and instrumental examination, on the 3rd–7th day after the development of myocardial infarction, patients underwent an assessment of plasma concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers and psychological testing using anxiety and depression rating scales. In the group of patients, individuals with and without personality type D were identified. Results and discussion. Personality type D was found in 29.1% of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Patients with personality type D were significantly younger, employed and married, had a higher body mass index and a significantly greater hereditary burden of arterial hypertension. In patients with personality type D, the values of pro-inflammatory markers were statistically significantly different from the comparison group, which indicates the intensity of subclinical inflammation and cytokine imbalance. Personality type D was significantly associated with total inflammation score and total endothelial dysfunction score. Significant differences were found in the ratio of patients with depressive conditions in subgroups of patients with personality type D. The values of echocardiographic parameters were also associated with the presence of personality type D. Conclusion. Personality type D was associated with impaired endothelial function in men with acute myocardial infarction, they were more likely to have depressive disorders. An adverse effect of personality type D on the cardiovascular system in patients with myocardial infarction was revealed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".