MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387928372 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13098

SRAI: Towards Standardization of Geospatial AI

2023· preprint· en· W4387928372 on OpenAlexaff
Piotr Gramacki, Kacper Leśniara, Kamil Raczycki, Szymon Woźniak, Marcin Przymus, Piotr Szymański

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisPython (programming language)Computer scienceStandardizationGeospatial PDFEmbeddingData scienceDatabaseSoftware engineeringArtificial intelligenceGeographyProgramming languageCartographyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial Representations for Artificial Intelligence (srai) is a Python library for working with geospatial data. The library can download geospatial data, split a given area into micro-regions using multiple algorithms and train an embedding model using various architectures. It includes baseline models as well as more complex methods from published works. Those capabilities make it possible to use srai in a complete pipeline for geospatial task solving. The proposed library is the first step to standardize the geospatial AI domain toolset. It is fully open-source and published under Apache 2.0 licence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207