MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387937478 · doi:10.1101/2023.10.23.563667

A novel genetic fluorescent reporter to visualize mitochondrial nucleoids

2023· preprint· en· W4387937478 on OpenAlexafffund
Jingti Deng, Mashiat Zaman, Lucy Swift, Fatemeh Shahhosseini, Abhishek Sharma, Daniela Bureik, Francesco Padovani, A Benedikt, Amit Jaiswal, Craig Brideau, Savraj Grewal, Kurt M. Schmoller, Pina Colarusso, Timothy E. Shutt

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFluorescenceMitochondrial DNANucleoidGenetic screenBiologyComputational biologyCell biologyGeneticsPhysicsGeneOpticsPhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mitochondria contain their own genome (mtDNA), which is present in hundreds of copies per cell and organized into nucleoid structures that are distributed throughout the dynamic mitochondrial network. Beyond encoding essential protein subunits for oxidative phosphorylation, mtDNA can also serve as a signalling molecule when it is present into the cytosol. Despite the importance of this genome, there are still many unknowns with respect to its regulation. To study mtDNA dynamics in living cells, we have developed a genetic fluorescent reporter, mt-HI-NESS, which is based on the HI-NESS reporter that uses the bacterial H-NS DNA binding domain. Here, we describe how this reporter can be used to image mtDNA nucleoids for live cell imaging without affecting the replication or expression of the mtDNA. In addition to demonstrating the adaptability of the mt-HI-NESS reporter for multiple fluorescent proteins, we also emphasize important factors to consider during the optimization and application of this reporter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→