Space-time and the production of meanings in Nuno Bragança's Directa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various disciplines have studied the Space and Time categories over time, both separately and together. For humans, according to Tuan, “The experience of space and time is largely subconscious” (2014, p. 118). As in human experience, these two categories are inseparable in narrative genre because “‘story time’ emerges from the interplay of space, events, characters, and plot structure” (Scheffel, 2014). The inseparability of Space and Time is also present and visible in a city, as shown by several authors. Concerning these two categories, in Nuno Bragança’s novel Directa , the author explores simultaneously the potential offered by the city of Lisbon and the narrative genre. In this chapter, we intend to show how the author treats space and time in the novel, especially, how he uses the practice of the city space as an intentional way to establish and treat various times and build essential messages of the work, especially through hero maps and routes, and reflections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it