Outcomes After Supraventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Group 1 Pulmonary Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with right ventricular pressure overload and atrial remodeling, which may result in supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs). The outcomes of catheter SVT ablation in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) group 1 PH are incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with WHO group 1 PH undergoing catheter SVT ablation during a 10-year period at a major academic tertiary care hospital. Baseline patient characteristics and procedural outcomes at 3 months and 1 year were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Ablation of 60 SVTs was attempted in 38 patients with group 1 PH. The initial procedural success rates were 80% for atrial fibrillation (AF, n = 5), 89.7% for typical atrial flutter (AFL, n = 29), 57.1% for atypical AFL (n = 7), 60% for atrial tachycardia (AT, n = 15), and 75% for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT, n = 4). The 1-year post-procedural recurrence rates were 100% for AF (n = 4), 25% for typical AFL (n = 20), 50% for atypical AFL (n = 2), and 28.6% for AT (n = 7). No patients had recurrent AVNRT (n = 2). There were seven (18.4%) peri-procedural decompensations requiring pressor initiation and transfer to intensive care and one (2.6%) peri-procedural death. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that SVT ablation in group 1 PH can be performed relatively safely and effectively, albeit with lower initial success rates and higher risk of clinical decompensation than in the general population. Recurrence rates at 1 year were higher in AF and atypical AFL ablations and similar for typical AFL and AT ablations when compared to the general population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".