Towards Real-Time Sleep Stage Prediction and Online Calibration Based on Architecturally Switchable Deep Learning Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the recent advances in automatic sleep staging, few studies have focused on real-time sleep staging to promote the regulation of sleep or the intervention of sleep disorders. In this paper, a novel network named SwSleepNet, that can handle both precisely offline sleep staging, and online sleep stages prediction and calibration is proposed. For offline analysis, the proposed network coordinates sequence broadening module (SBM), sequential CNN (SCNN), squeeze and excitation (SE) block, and sequence consolidation module (SCM) to balance the operational efficiency of the network and the comprehensive feature extraction. For online analysis, only SCNN and SE are involved in predicting the sleep stage within a short-time segment of the recordings. Once more than two successive segments have disparate predictions, the calibration mechanism will be triggered, and contextual information will be involved. In addition, to investigate the appropriate time of the segment that is suitable to predict a sleep stage, segments with five-second, three-second, and two-second data are analyzed. The performance of SwSleepNet is validated on two publicly available datasets Sleep-EDF Expanded and Montreal Archive of Sleep Studies (MASS), and one clinical dataset Huashan Hospital Fudan University (HSFU), with the offline accuracy of 84.5%, 86.7%, and 81.8%, respectively, which outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, for the online sleep staging, the dedicated calibration mechanism allows SwSleepNet to achieve high accuracy over 80% on three datasets with the short-time segments, demonstrating the robustness and stability of SwSleepNet. This study presents a real-time sleep staging architecture, which is expected to pave the way for accurate sleep regulation and intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".