MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387949777 · doi:10.14503/thij-23-8242

The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial

2023· article· en· W4387949777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas Heart Institute Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTexas Heart Institute
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionHeart failureMyocardial infarctionCardiologyCell therapyClinical trialInternal medicineStem-cell therapyStroke volumeVentricular remodelingStroke (engine)Bone marrowIntensive care medicineCellTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following advances in prevention and management, clinical outcomes for patients with ischemic heart disease—in particular, myocardial infarction—have substantially improved. There remains, however, an unmet need for novel therapies to better manage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction beyond that afforded by current lifestyle modification and pharmacologic management. Cell-based therapies offer a promise to address this need.Although limited in numbers and duration of follow-up, meta-analyses by the Cochrane Group1 and others support the suggestion that, unlike trials on acute myocardial infarction, there is a signal of benefit after cell-based therapy for patients with more chronic ischemic heart disease who have HFrEF. These analyses suggest that autologous bone marrow cell-based treatment may reduce early mortality and rehospitalizations as a result of HF. These studies also showed evidence to support clinical health benefits, including improved left ventricular end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction, along with positive changes in New York Heart Association functional class and exercise capacity.Recent developments, such as rapid, on-site cell processing and the ability to provide a high-dose cellular product2-4 enriched in cells previously shown to be associated with a favorable response,2,5,6 offer additional promise to address this need.The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02438306) is designed to test whether intramyocardial delivery of high-dose autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM MNCs) in patients selected for the characteristics of their cells can improve clinical outcomes in ischemic HFrEF.7 The trial is actively enrolling up to 260 patients in up to 40 centers in the United States and Canada, with a 10-patient, open-label, “roll-in” cohort. Trial design and outcomes are summarized in Figure 1.The roll-in, open-label cohort has been completed at 3 US centers. All 10 patients received the autologous BM MNCs successfully, and no serious adverse events were observed related to any of the procedures performed.8 Despite symptomatic ischemic HFrEF, 2-year survival was 100%, and all patients completed 24 months of follow-up. Changes in guideline-directed improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion scores over the follow-up period (Fig. 2) were consistent with improvements in functional capacity, as measured by an increased median change in 6-minute walk distance of 37.5 meters at 12 months and an increase of 31 meters at 24 months, and in quality of life, as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, in 7 of 10 patients at 12 months and 6 of 10 patients at 24 months.9The randomized, double-blind cohort study continues to enroll patients with ischemic HFrEF at centers in the United States and Canada. To date, 110 patients have been enrolled and randomly assigned, with 10 of those patients randomly assigned to the control group having crossed over to receive the active cell treatment after 2 years of follow-up, as prespecified in the study protocol.With the high CD34-positive effective dosage provided by the selected autologous BM MNCs, completion of the current trial is occurring in parallel with a different clinical trial program designed to evaluate the same autologous, personalized cell product for patients with refractory angina and chronic myocardial ischemia (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03455725). To date, 3 patients have been enrolled in this study.As a complementary adjunct to the ongoing phase 3 trial with autologous BM MNCs for patients with ischemic HFrEF, a trial to evaluate an allogeneic natural killer-1R–positive mesenchymal stem cell product for the same indication is beginning in 2023. This trial is intended to target patients who lack the optimal cells for personalized treatment using autologous BM MNCs.On July 24, 2023, the sponsor announced a pause in enrollment based on an interim analysis and recommendations made by the independent data and safety monitoring board. Although there were no treatment-emergent safety concerns, the analysis indicated that the trial was unlikely to meet its primary 12-month, 3-tier hierarchical efficacy end point. Notably, available 24-month follow-up data suggest a 37% relative risk reduction in cardiac death equivalents and an 18% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The sponsor, the principal investigators, and the executive steering committee are exploring a protocol redesign to better test whether this therapeutic approach is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it