The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Following advances in prevention and management, clinical outcomes for patients with ischemic heart disease—in particular, myocardial infarction—have substantially improved. There remains, however, an unmet need for novel therapies to better manage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction beyond that afforded by current lifestyle modification and pharmacologic management. Cell-based therapies offer a promise to address this need.Although limited in numbers and duration of follow-up, meta-analyses by the Cochrane Group1 and others support the suggestion that, unlike trials on acute myocardial infarction, there is a signal of benefit after cell-based therapy for patients with more chronic ischemic heart disease who have HFrEF. These analyses suggest that autologous bone marrow cell-based treatment may reduce early mortality and rehospitalizations as a result of HF. These studies also showed evidence to support clinical health benefits, including improved left ventricular end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction, along with positive changes in New York Heart Association functional class and exercise capacity.Recent developments, such as rapid, on-site cell processing and the ability to provide a high-dose cellular product2-4 enriched in cells previously shown to be associated with a favorable response,2,5,6 offer additional promise to address this need.The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02438306) is designed to test whether intramyocardial delivery of high-dose autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM MNCs) in patients selected for the characteristics of their cells can improve clinical outcomes in ischemic HFrEF.7 The trial is actively enrolling up to 260 patients in up to 40 centers in the United States and Canada, with a 10-patient, open-label, “roll-in” cohort. Trial design and outcomes are summarized in Figure 1.The roll-in, open-label cohort has been completed at 3 US centers. All 10 patients received the autologous BM MNCs successfully, and no serious adverse events were observed related to any of the procedures performed.8 Despite symptomatic ischemic HFrEF, 2-year survival was 100%, and all patients completed 24 months of follow-up. Changes in guideline-directed improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion scores over the follow-up period (Fig. 2) were consistent with improvements in functional capacity, as measured by an increased median change in 6-minute walk distance of 37.5 meters at 12 months and an increase of 31 meters at 24 months, and in quality of life, as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, in 7 of 10 patients at 12 months and 6 of 10 patients at 24 months.9The randomized, double-blind cohort study continues to enroll patients with ischemic HFrEF at centers in the United States and Canada. To date, 110 patients have been enrolled and randomly assigned, with 10 of those patients randomly assigned to the control group having crossed over to receive the active cell treatment after 2 years of follow-up, as prespecified in the study protocol.With the high CD34-positive effective dosage provided by the selected autologous BM MNCs, completion of the current trial is occurring in parallel with a different clinical trial program designed to evaluate the same autologous, personalized cell product for patients with refractory angina and chronic myocardial ischemia (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03455725). To date, 3 patients have been enrolled in this study.As a complementary adjunct to the ongoing phase 3 trial with autologous BM MNCs for patients with ischemic HFrEF, a trial to evaluate an allogeneic natural killer-1R–positive mesenchymal stem cell product for the same indication is beginning in 2023. This trial is intended to target patients who lack the optimal cells for personalized treatment using autologous BM MNCs.On July 24, 2023, the sponsor announced a pause in enrollment based on an interim analysis and recommendations made by the independent data and safety monitoring board. Although there were no treatment-emergent safety concerns, the analysis indicated that the trial was unlikely to meet its primary 12-month, 3-tier hierarchical efficacy end point. Notably, available 24-month follow-up data suggest a 37% relative risk reduction in cardiac death equivalents and an 18% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The sponsor, the principal investigators, and the executive steering committee are exploring a protocol redesign to better test whether this therapeutic approach is effective.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle