MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4387949777 · doi:10.14503/thij-23-8242

The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial

2023· article· en· W4387949777 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carl J. Pepine, Amish N. Raval

Notice bibliographique

RevueTexas Heart Institute Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMesenchymal stem cell research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesTexas Heart Institute
Mots-clésMedicineEjection fractionHeart failureMyocardial infarctionCardiologyCell therapyClinical trialInternal medicineStem-cell therapyStroke volumeVentricular remodelingStroke (engine)Bone marrowIntensive care medicineCellTransplantation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Following advances in prevention and management, clinical outcomes for patients with ischemic heart disease—in particular, myocardial infarction—have substantially improved. There remains, however, an unmet need for novel therapies to better manage heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction beyond that afforded by current lifestyle modification and pharmacologic management. Cell-based therapies offer a promise to address this need.Although limited in numbers and duration of follow-up, meta-analyses by the Cochrane Group1 and others support the suggestion that, unlike trials on acute myocardial infarction, there is a signal of benefit after cell-based therapy for patients with more chronic ischemic heart disease who have HFrEF. These analyses suggest that autologous bone marrow cell-based treatment may reduce early mortality and rehospitalizations as a result of HF. These studies also showed evidence to support clinical health benefits, including improved left ventricular end-systolic volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction, along with positive changes in New York Heart Association functional class and exercise capacity.Recent developments, such as rapid, on-site cell processing and the ability to provide a high-dose cellular product2-4 enriched in cells previously shown to be associated with a favorable response,2,5,6 offer additional promise to address this need.The CardiAMP Cell Therapy for Heart Failure trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02438306) is designed to test whether intramyocardial delivery of high-dose autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM MNCs) in patients selected for the characteristics of their cells can improve clinical outcomes in ischemic HFrEF.7 The trial is actively enrolling up to 260 patients in up to 40 centers in the United States and Canada, with a 10-patient, open-label, “roll-in” cohort. Trial design and outcomes are summarized in Figure 1.The roll-in, open-label cohort has been completed at 3 US centers. All 10 patients received the autologous BM MNCs successfully, and no serious adverse events were observed related to any of the procedures performed.8 Despite symptomatic ischemic HFrEF, 2-year survival was 100%, and all patients completed 24 months of follow-up. Changes in guideline-directed improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion scores over the follow-up period (Fig. 2) were consistent with improvements in functional capacity, as measured by an increased median change in 6-minute walk distance of 37.5 meters at 12 months and an increase of 31 meters at 24 months, and in quality of life, as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, in 7 of 10 patients at 12 months and 6 of 10 patients at 24 months.9The randomized, double-blind cohort study continues to enroll patients with ischemic HFrEF at centers in the United States and Canada. To date, 110 patients have been enrolled and randomly assigned, with 10 of those patients randomly assigned to the control group having crossed over to receive the active cell treatment after 2 years of follow-up, as prespecified in the study protocol.With the high CD34-positive effective dosage provided by the selected autologous BM MNCs, completion of the current trial is occurring in parallel with a different clinical trial program designed to evaluate the same autologous, personalized cell product for patients with refractory angina and chronic myocardial ischemia (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03455725). To date, 3 patients have been enrolled in this study.As a complementary adjunct to the ongoing phase 3 trial with autologous BM MNCs for patients with ischemic HFrEF, a trial to evaluate an allogeneic natural killer-1R–positive mesenchymal stem cell product for the same indication is beginning in 2023. This trial is intended to target patients who lack the optimal cells for personalized treatment using autologous BM MNCs.On July 24, 2023, the sponsor announced a pause in enrollment based on an interim analysis and recommendations made by the independent data and safety monitoring board. Although there were no treatment-emergent safety concerns, the analysis indicated that the trial was unlikely to meet its primary 12-month, 3-tier hierarchical efficacy end point. Notably, available 24-month follow-up data suggest a 37% relative risk reduction in cardiac death equivalents and an 18% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The sponsor, the principal investigators, and the executive steering committee are exploring a protocol redesign to better test whether this therapeutic approach is effective.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,071
Tête enseignante GPT0,366
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTexas Heart Institute JournalMême sujetMesenchymal stem cell researchTravaux en français237 207