Scene Parsing Using Fully Convolutional Network for Semantic Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When it comes to computer vision, scene parsing is a crucial part of semantic segmentation. It has a wide range of applications, including autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, natural language processing, object detection, and image and video editing. Semantic segmentation works by classifying each pixel of an image according to the object it belongs to, and scene parsing provides contextual information to improve the accuracy and robustness of deep learning models used for this purpose. In this study, we used the Fully Convolutional Network (FCN-8) architecture, a popular deep learning-based technique that achieves higher accuracy than traditional and state-of-the-art methods. This is achieved by creating hierarchies of distinctive features in an image. The FCN-8 is used to perform semantic segmentation efficiently, taking an image of any size as input and producing correspondingly sized output with effective inference and learning. To fine-tune the FCN-8 for the MIT Scene Parsing Challenge Dataset, we employed a transfer learning approach. Our results showed that our proposed approach achieved an accuracy of 72% on the dataset. This is significant given the relatively small number of samples and the 150 classes of objects. Our work demonstrates a successful pilot study for deploying transfer learning and the FCN-8 architecture for scene parsing and semantic segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".