MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Self-Detection Gradient Descent Approach for Semi-Underground LoRa Communication Networks in Smart Irrigation Systems

2023· article· en· W4387951237 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Kong, Yuan Liu, Hao Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePath lossWireless sensor networkScheduleWater contentWirelessReal-time computingGradient descentStochastic gradient descentEnvironmental scienceDistributed computingComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless underground sensor networks (WUSNs) have practical applications in domains such as military operations, agriculture, and information science. However, the large attenuation of signals underground has always posed a challenge, especially when it involves dynamic and changing environments. In large irrigation landscapes, the irrigation process is usually required multiple times per day in torrid areas, and the wireless signal is highly attenuated due to soil moisture. Consequently, communication link disconnections may easily happen and highly waste time and energy consumption. Thus it is necessary to have a precise path loss model considering soil moisture to ensure that the path loss does not exceed the allocated link budget. In this work, we present a comprehensive study on the impact of soil moisture on the communication link among underground and aboveground nodes and propose a mathematical long-range (LoRa) path loss model that considers the complex dielectric constant of the soil. Furthermore, we develop a self-detection stochastic gradient descent (SSGD) approach with a distributed clustering sensor network architecture that can self-detect disconnections caused by the irrigation schedule. Based on our case study, it is demonstrated that the SSGD approach is more efficient and reliable than the traditional stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms in high-moisture conditions for smart irrigation applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207