Regenerative leisure and tourism: a pathway for mindful futures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emergence of regenerative tourism has gained worldwide momentum to raise awareness of the environmental and sociocultural impacts of recreational activities in host environments. The article examines leisure as human behaviour in its past, present and future perspectives to identify the current and future avenues of regeneration in leisure and tourist experiences. Although regenerative practices are much older than the COVID-19 pandemic, the current situation necessitates a focus on regenerative understanding that should be integrated into local systems both in the short and long term. Results suggest that to move beyond sustainability and the confines of capitalism, regeneration must be planned and developed in line with Indigenous values. Its effectiveness in reshaping leisure and tourism practices will depend on a collective commitment to finding innovative solutions that benefit the natural world and the diverse communities that interact with it because regeneration looks holistically at the relationship between humans and nature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it