MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electromagnetic moments of the antimony isotopes 112−133Sb

2023· article· en· W4387953185 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Lechner, T. Miyagi, Z. Y. Xu, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, B. Cheal, C. S. Devlin, R. F. García Ruíz, J. S. M. Ginges, H. Heylen, J. D. Holt, Phillip Imgram, A. Kanellakopoulos, Á. Koszorús, S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer, R. Neugart, G. Neyens, W. Nörtershäuser, P. Plattner, L. V. Rodríguez, G. Sanamyan, S. R. Stroberg, Y. Utsuno, X. F. Yang, D. T. Yordanov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTRIUMF
FundersHorizon 2020National Key Research and Development Program of ChinaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaEuropean Research CouncilVlaamse regeringKU LeuvenHelmholtz International Center for FAIRFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMax-Planck-GesellschaftDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionWestern Canada Research GridAustralian GovernmentBundesministerium für Bildung und FrauenNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCompute CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuadrupoleIsotopeMagnetic momentPhysicsAntimonyNeutronSHELL modelValence (chemistry)Atomic physicsChemistryNuclear physicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear moments of the antimony isotopes 113−133Sb are measured by collinear laser spectroscopy and used to benchmark phenomenological shell-model and ab initio calculations in the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG). The shell-model calculations reproduce the electromagnetic moments over all Sb isotopes when suitable effective g-factors and charges are employed. Good agreement is achieved by VS-IMSRG for magnetic moments on the neutron-deficient side for both odd-even and odd-odd Sb isotopes while its results deviate from experiment on the neutron-rich side. When the same effective g-factors are used, VS-IMSRG agrees with experiment nearly as well as the shell model. Hence, the wave functions are very similar in both approaches and missing contributions to the M1 operator are identified as the cause of the discrepancy of VS-IMSRG with experiment. Electric quadrupole moments remain more challenging for VS-IMSRG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207