MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fat, oil and grease wastewater and dishwashers: Uncovering the link to FOG deposition

2023· article· en· W4387956311 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nilufa Sultana, Felicity Roddick, Biplob Kumar Pramanik

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRMIT UniversityOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsGreaseWastewaterEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryWaste managementChemistryEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fats, oils, and grease (FOG) in wastewater generated by commercial food establishments can cause severe environmental damage if not adequately treated. Grease interceptors (GIs) are an effective solution to limit FOG disposal into the sewer, but their efficiency greatly depends on the wastewater's characteristics. This laboratory study examined the physical and chemical properties of synthetic FOG wastewater from handwashing sinks and dishwashers using cooked animal fats and oils, some food solids and the same amount of detergent to explore the impact of dishwashers on key FOG components that contribute to FOG depositions. Results showed that dishwasher-generated wastewater had a significant influence on fatty acid (FA) transformations, particularly in producing very long chain saturated FAs. Relative proportions of FAs revealed a considerable proportion of very long chain FAs, such as palmitoleic (C16:1), linoleic (C18:2), α-linolenic (C18:3), arachidic (C20:0), paullinic (C20:1), behenic (C22:0), erucic (C22:1), lignoceric (C24:0) and nervonic (C24:1), among which most were not highlighted in the real field FOG wastewater. These FAs may play a significant role in FOG solidification if not sufficiently removed before disposal to sewer. The study also found that dishwashers were able to break down FOG particles, creating smaller particles (75 % being ≤68.8 μm and 50 % being ≤7 μm), while handwashing sinks produced larger particles (50 % being ≤118 μm and 10 % being ≤7 μm and). Samples containing cooked animal fats were more likely to be fragmented into smaller sizes than cooking oils due to the impact of the dishwasher. Confocal microscopy analysis results were consistent with the particle sizes measured by laser diffraction. These distinct properties could serve as criteria for updating GI designs, limiting the amount of FOG and FAs disposed of in the sewer system and controlling solidification and blockages, which pose significant threats to the environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total EnvironmentSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207