MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387956934 · doi:10.3389/fspas.2023.1278794

cavsiopy: a Python package to calculate and visualize spacecraft instrument orientation

2023· article· en· W4387956934 on OpenAlexafffund
E. Ceren Kalafatoglu Eyiguler, Warren Holley, Andrew Howarth, D. W. Danskin, Kuldeep Pandey, C. J. Martin, R. G. Gillies, A. W. Yau, G. C. Hussey

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsSpacecraftEphemerisPhysicsAzimuthReference framePython (programming language)GeodesyOrientation (vector space)Remote sensingComputer scienceAerospace engineeringAstronomySatelliteFrame (networking)GeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spacecraft attitude plays an important role in the observations of various atmospheric, planetary, and terrestrial parameters and phenomena that are of interest to the scientific community. Precise measurements from imagers, particle sensors, and antennas require accurate knowledge of instrument orientation. cavsiopy is an easy-to-install and use, light-weight open-source Python package for researchers who need to consider instrument pointing direction and observation geometry. cavsiopy contains the coordinate transformation routines and the corresponding rotation matrices from the spacecraft orbital reference frame (ORF) to any of the geocentric equatorial inertial for epoch J2000 (GEI J2K)/International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF), Earth-centered, Earth-fixed (ECEF), International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF), geodetic north-east-down, and geocentric north-east-center coordinate systems. Additionally, cavsiopy includes routines for importing Swarm-E ephemeris and generic two-line-element (TLE) data files; for the calculation of spacecraft azimuth, elevation, and orbital parameters; as well as for the 2D/3D visualization of the geometry between the instrument and the target. Functionality and utilization of cavsiopy for research problems are demonstrated with examples and visualizations for the Radio Receiver Instrument (RRI) and the Fast Auroral Imager (FAI) of e-POP/Swarm-E.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Astronomy and Space SciencesSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207