Evidence of Coal Biodegradation from Coalbed-Produced Water – A Case Study of Dafosi Gas Field, Ordos Basin, China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Bioconversion of coal to methane occurs in the coalbed aquifer environment. To investigate the evidence of coal biodegradation from coalbed-produced water, we collected six field water samples from the Dafosi gas field and prepared one laboratory-simulated water sample and one indoor anaerobic microbial degradation sample with the highest compound concentration as the two reference standards. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to detect the organic compound type, concentration, and differences in the biomarker compound sensitivity. Results indicate that extracted organic matter from coalbed-produced water samples can be evidence of biodegradation. Variations in range compounds (such as n -alkanes, tri- and pentacyclic terpenes, and steranes) and their sensitivity confirmed active microbial degradation in the studied area. A positive correlation between the n -alkanes content in the coalbed-produced water and the stable carbon isotope value of methane further verifies that the n -alkanes are primary substrates for maintaining microbial activity. Therefore, evidence including n -alkanes, tri- and pentacyclic terpenes, steranes, unresolved complex mixtures, and stable carbon isotope composition of methane contribute to biogenic methane generation in situ. Our limited data suggest that managing soluble organic matter in the coalbed-produced water may provide a viable route for coal biodegradation since most microorganisms survive within the coal seam water.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it