Mitigating Motion Blur for Robust 3D Baseball Player Pose Modeling for Pitch Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using videos to analyze pitchers in baseball can play a vital role in strategizing and injury prevention. Computer vision-based pose analysis offers a time-eficient and cost-effective approach. However, the use of accessible broadcast videos, with a 30fps framerate, often results in partial body motion blur during fast actions, limiting the performance of existing pose keypoint estimation models. Previous works have primarily relied on fixed backgrounds, assuming minimal motion differences between frames, or utilized multiview data to address this problem. To this end, we propose a synthetic data augmentation pipeline to enhance the model's capability to deal with the pitcher's blurry actions. In addition, we leverage in-the-wild videos to make our model robust under different real-world conditions and camera positions. By carefully optimizing the augmentation parameters, we observed a notable reduction in the loss by 54.2% and 36.2% on the test dataset for 2D and 3D pose estimation respectively. By applying our approach to existing state-of-the-art pose estimators, we demonstrate an average improvement of 29.2%. The findings highlight the effectiveness of our method in mitigating the challenges posed by motion blur, thereby enhancing the overall quality of pose estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".