Jersey Number Recognition using Keyframe Identification from Low-Resolution Broadcast Videos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Player identification is a crucial component in vision-driven soccer analytics, enabling various downstream tasks such as player assess- ment, in-game analysis, and broadcast production. However, auto- matically detecting jersey numbers from player tracklets in videos presents challenges due to motion blur, low resolution, distortions, and occlusions. Existing methods, utilizing Spatial Transformer Networks, CNNs, and Vision Transformers, have shown success in image data but struggle with real-world video data, where jersey numbers are not visible in most of the frames. Hence, identifying frames that contain the jersey number is a key sub-problem to tackle. To address these issues, we propose a robust keyframe identification module that extracts frames containing essential high-level infor- mation about the jersey number. A spatio-temporal network is then employed to model spatial and temporal context and predict the probabilities of jersey numbers in the video. Additionally, we adopt a multi-task loss function to predict the probability distribution of each digit separately. Extensive evaluations on the SoccerNet dataset demonstrate that incorporating our proposed keyframe identification module results in a significant 37.81% and 37.70% increase in the accuracies of 2 different test sets with domain gaps. These results highlight the effectiveness and importance of our approach in tackling the challenges of automatic jersey number detection in sports videos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".