MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Addressing challenges in telephone triage for outpatient oncology care: A data-centred digital routing solution.

2023· article· en· W4387962269 on OpenAlexafffund
Mike Lovas, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Faiza Somji, Shayla Devonish, Grace Spiro, Tran Truong, Kelly Lane, Adam Badzynski, Susan M. Wolf, Iryna Tymoshyk, Alyssa Macedo, Graham Dozois, Ana Bravo, Anet Julius, Lesley Moody, Simranjit Kooner, Sheena Melwani, Alejandro Berlín

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Oncology Practice · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHealthcare Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsTriageWorkflowMedicineService (business)Medical emergencyPatient satisfactionTelemedicineService providerHealth careNursingComputer scienceDatabaseBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

591 Background: As cancer care shifts to a predominately outpatient model, there is growing recognition that optimizing communication between patients and their care providers between scheduled visits can improve efficiency and patient outcomes. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM), which sees over 80,000 patients annually, operates with many parallel telephone triage lines as the primary means of patients-provider communication. When a patient needs to contact their care team, they are instructed to leave a voicemail and wait for a response. In a high-volume setting this model presents many challenges to the patient experience, provider efficiency, and patient safety. The purpose of this pilot project was to design, implement, and assess the feasibility of a digital channel for patients to reach their care team. Methods: We used a human-centred design approach to develop a new digital triage service. First, we analyzed manually collected triage call data over a one-year period to understand the most common patient queries of the telephone triage service. Through co-design, a new digital-triage service was conceptualized and prototyped. Subsequently, we tested a data-centred digital routing algorithm for patient concerns and symptoms. To evaluate implementation and assess feasibility, we collected usage data, satisfaction surveys, and conducted staff shadowing and interviews. We used PDSA cycles to refine user experience and clinical workflows. Results: Patient adoption of digital triage increased continuously over 9 months, with volumes surpassing voicemail after four months: over the last four months digital triage has encompassed on average 63% of the total request volumes. The response rate to patient surveys was 21%. Patients indicated being very satisfied or satisfied (74.4%), neutral (6.7%), and dissatisfied or very dissatisfied (18.9%). Interviews with leading triage staff suggest the digital channel improves triage efficiency and redirecting/escalation by providing structured and complete patient queries. Conclusions: The pilot highlights the feasibility and acceptability of a digital-triage service in a comprehensive cancer care setting. By leveraging digital tools and real-time data, PM addressed the challenges of telephone triage, enabling a more efficient process to respond to patients’ needs, while demonstrating high adoption and patient satisfaction. Subsequent work will expand the use of digital triage to all disease sites across the cancer centre, and create foundational workflows and technology for proactive care models, such as Remote Patient Monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.384
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.035 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCO Oncology PracticeSame topicHealthcare Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207