SEAM: Searching Transferable Mixed-Precision Quantization Policy through Large Margin Regularization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mixed-precision quantization (MPQ) suffers from the time-consuming process of searching the optimal bit-width allocation (i.e., the policy) for each layer, especially when using large-scale datasets such as ISLVRC-2012. This limits the practicality of MPQ in real-world deployment scenarios. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel method for efficiently searching for effective MPQ policies using a small proxy dataset instead of the large-scale dataset used for training the model. Deviating from the established norm of employing a consistent dataset for both model training and MPQ policy search stages, our approach, therefore, yields a substantial enhancement in the efficiency of MPQ exploration. Nonetheless, using discrepant datasets poses challenges in searching for a transferable MPQ policy. Driven by the observation that quantization noise of sub-optimal policy exerts a detrimental influence on the discriminability of feature representations---manifesting as diminished class margins and ambiguous decision boundaries---our method aims to identify policies that uphold the discriminative nature of feature representations, i.e., intra-class compactness and inter-class separation. This general and dataset-independent property makes us search for the MPQ policy over a rather small-scale proxy dataset and then the policy can be directly used to quantize the model trained on a large-scale dataset. Our method offers several advantages, including high proxy data utilization, no excessive hyper-parameter tuning, and high searching efficiency. We search high-quality MPQ policies with the proxy dataset that has only 4% of the data scale compared to the large-scale target dataset, achieving the same accuracy as searching directly on the latter, improving MPQ searching efficiency by up to 300×.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".