ECENet: Explainable and Context-Enhanced Network for Muti-modal Fact verification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, falsified claims incorporating both text and images have been disseminated more effectively than those containing text alone, raising significant concerns for multi-modal fact verification. Existing research makes contributions to multi-modal feature extraction and interaction, but fails to fully utilize and enhance the valuable and intricate semantic relationships between distinct features. Moreover, most detectors merely provide a single outcome judgment and lack an inference process or explanation. Taking these factors into account, we propose a novel Explainable and Context-Enhanced Network (ECENet) for multi-modal fact verification, making the first attempt to integrate multi-clue feature extraction, multi-level feature reasoning, and justification (explanation) generation within a unified framework. Specifically, we propose an Improved Coarse- and Fine-grained Attention Network, equipped with two types of level-grained attention mechanisms, to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of contextual information. Furthermore, we propose a novel justification generation module via deep reinforcement learning that does not require additional labels. In this module, a sentence extractor agent measures the importance between the query claim and all document sentences at each time step, selecting a suitable amount of high-scoring sentences to be rewritten as the explanation of the model. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it