Kirill POSTOUTENKO, Alexey TIKHOMIROV et Dmitri ZAKHARINE, éds., Media and Communication in the Soviet Union (1917-1953). General Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un essai classique publié il y a soixante ans, Herbert Marshall McLuhan a déclaré de manière provocatrice que « le médium est le message » 1 .Selon le théoricien de la communication canadien, les effets des médias dépendent davantage du canal de transmission que du contenu du message.L'introduction de nouvelles technologies et pratiques de communication modifie profondément les relations sociales et les manières de percevoir le monde.La première moitié du XX e siècle n'a pas seulement été marquée par l'effondrement de quatre empires et la formation de nouveaux régimes politiques, y compris totalitaires, mais aussi par le développement spectaculaire des nouvelles technologies de communication.L'ouvrage collectif édité par Kirill Postoutenko, Alexei Tikhomirov et Dmitri Zakharine Media and Communication in the Soviet Union .General Perspectives vise à comprendre le rôle joué par les médias et la communication dans la mise en place du système sociopolitique soviétique, de Lenin à Stalin.Le livre s'ouvre sur une dédicace à Larissa Zakharova ,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".