The SNR of time-of-flight positron emission tomography data for joint reconstruction of the activity and attenuation images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Measurement of the time-of-flight (TOF) difference of each coincident pair of photons increases the effective sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET). Many authors have analyzed the benefit of TOF for quantification and hot spot detection in the reconstructed activity images. However, TOF not only improves the effective sensitivity, it also enables the joint reconstruction of the tracer concentration and attenuation images. This can be used to correct for errors in CT- or MR-derived attenuation maps, or to apply attenuation correction without the help of a second modality. This paper presents an analysis of the effect of TOF on the variance of the jointly reconstructed attenuation and (attenuation corrected) tracer concentration images. Approach. The analysis is performed for PET systems that have a distribution of possibly non-Gaussian TOF-kernels, and includes the conventional Gaussian TOF-kernel as a special case. Non-Gaussian TOF-kernels are often observed in novel detector designs, which make use of two (or more) different mechanisms to convert the incoming 511 keV photon to optical photons. The analytical result is validated with a simple 2D simulation. Main results. We show that if two different TOF-kernels are equivalent for image reconstruction with known attenuation, then they are also equivalent for joint reconstruction of the activity and the attenuation images. The variance increase in the activity, caused by also jointly reconstructing the attenuation image, vanishes when the TOF-resolution approaches perfection. Significance. These results are of interest for PET detector development and for the development of stand-alone PET systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".