MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387999743 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad341.052

47 Feeding Pigs with Low Crude Protein Diets: Impact of Pig Manure Nitrogen Content on Biogas Production and Digestate Quality

2023· article· en· W4387999743 on OpenAlexaff
Felipe Hickmann, Inês Andretta, Léa Cappelaere, Bernard Goyette, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, Rajinikanth Rajagopal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigestateManureKjeldahl methodBiogasAmmoniacal nitrogenAnaerobic digestionAnimal scienceChemistryBioenergyFood scienceNitrogenAgronomyBiofuelPulp and paper industryBiotechnologyWaste managementBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lowering dietary crude protein levels is a nutritional strategy recognized to both decrease the use of high-impact feed ingredients and reduce nitrogen (N) excretion. Improved pig manure management practices can further mitigate the environmental impacts associated with pig production towards net-zero emissions. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising technology for transforming pig manure into energy as biogas and into bio-based fertilizers (i.e., digestate from AD). However, little is known about the effects of pig manure N content on AD. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of pig manure N content on biogas production and digestate quality through the AD of manure from pigs fed low crude protein diets. Three pig manure N concentrations were tested: T1 = 5873, T2 = 5421, and T3 = 5149 total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN, mg/L). Throughout 5 sequential fed-batch cycles (25 ± 4 days/cycle), biogas production and its composition (CH4, CO2, and H2S) were measured, while raw manure and weekly digestate samples were analyzed for total solids (TS, %), volatile solids (VS, %), pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD, mg/L), TKN, and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N, mg/L). In a temperature-controlled room (20 ± 1ºC), 6 digesters (3 treatments x 2 replicates) were operated as single-stage reactors to digest pig slurry (mixture of urine and feces, TS: 5.6%) inoculated with a liquid inoculum (TS: 2.3%) to improve manure-microbe interactions. Data were analyzed by ANOVA using PROC MIXED with repeated measures and comparison of means through the Tukey test (SAS software). In addition, both correlation and regression analyses were performed with R to evaluate the relationship among variables. Decreasing pig manure N content showed a tendency to reduce biogas (-20% in T3 vs T1; P = 0.0782) and methane (-22% in T3 vs T1; P = 0.0576) production per cycle, as shown in Table 1. Regarding biogas composition, CH4/biogas and CH4/CO2 decreased with N content (-3 and -4% in T3 vs T1; P ≤ 0.0082). There were strong positive correlations between the N content of pig manure and the amount of NH3-N (linear: r = 0.94, R2 = 0.88) and TKN (linear: r = 0.90, R2 = 0.81) present in the digestate at the end of each cycle. These results suggest that a reduction in pig manure N content reduces biogas production and its quality (ratio of CH4 to CO2). This latter variable is important for biogas efficiency; thus, reducing crude protein in pig diets may impair the production of biogas in AD. However, a decreased N content may cause less emissions into the environment, but when using the digestate as fertilizer, it may not entirely fulfill the N requirements of fast-growing crops for a given application rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207