MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388001576 · doi:10.1177/87552930231202974

Cold‐formed steel framed shear wall test database

2023· article· en· W4388001576 on OpenAlex
Zhidong Zhang, Mohammed M. Eladly, Colin A. Rogers, Benjamin W. Schafer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Spectra · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDatabaseShear wallShear (geology)Cold-formed steelStructural engineeringDirect shear testTest dataEngineeringGeologyComputer scienceMaterials scienceProgramming languageComposite materialBuckling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many monotonic and cyclic tests have been conducted on cold‐formed steel framed shear walls in the last 20 years. Cold‐formed steel framed shear wall provisions in AISI S240, AISI S400, and ASCE 41 are supported by the data obtained through these tests. The main objective of this article is to introduce a recently compiled cold‐formed steel framed shear wall test database, to reveal the database structure, and to explain how to access and present the data. Most recently, the database has been standardized and expanded to include additional tests, complete cyclic information from tests, limit states, and code prediction information. The database structure incorporates a central Excel spreadsheet that includes descriptive information; ordered plain text files for each individual test; and custom MATLAB codes, which can read, process, and plot designated database subsets. The provided database can advance the understanding and modeling of cold‐formed steel framed shear walls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it