Primary Care in Management of Pulmonary Embolism in Prolonged Recumbences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A frequent and possibly fatal kind of venous thromboembolic illness is pulmonary embolism (PE). It is a significant issue for public health. A typical diagnosis as a primary care in an emergency room is pulmonary embolism (PE). Additionally, it makes up a sizable portion of the patients admitted to hospital wards. In selected low-risk individuals with acute PE, there is mounting evidence that outpatient therapy, or treatment without hospitalization, is practical, safe, and efficient. PE patients may be risk-classified and given an early release from the emergency department. As a result, there are more hospital beds available for other patients, which lowers treatment expenses for the healthcare system. There is growing support for the outpatient care of low-risk, hemo-dynamically stable patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE). There is assistance in identifying patients who are eligible for outpatient (primary) care. This move has been made easier by the accessibility and simplicity of direct oral anticoagulants. Acute PE is currently mostly treated with direct, non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants. In comparison to vitamin K antagonists, they have been demonstrated to simplify initial and prolonged anticoagulation regimes while lowering the risk of bleeding. In this consensus practice document, we present a thorough analysis of primary care in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of acute PE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".