Implementation of an Additional Course on Creative Thai Dramatic Art Skills and Appreciation of the Values of Thai Culture for Grade 7 Student Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Kalasin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thailand has many cultural heritages that have been inherited from the ancestors, including language, traditions, architecture, art and culture, music, as well as dramatic arts that have been evident since the Sukhothai period and have been handed down to the present. This study aimed to investigate the implementation outcomes of an additional course on creative Thai dramatic art skills and appreciation of the values of Thai culture for grade 7 students under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Kalasin. The sample was forty-two grade 7 students of Anukoolnaree School in the first semester of the academic year 2022, selected by cluster random sampling (classroom). The research instruments were a Thai dramatic art knowledge test, an evaluation form on basic Thai dramatic art ability, an evaluation form on a creative Thai dramatic art designing ability, and an appreciation of the values of Thai culture questionnaire. The data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation, and t-test (Dependent Samples). The results showed that the post-test mean score of Thai dramatic art knowledge was higher than the pre-test mean score, the basic Thai dramatic art ability and the creative Thai dramatic art designing ability were at the highest levels, and appreciation of the values of Thai culture was significantly higher at the .05 level. Furthermore, students’ overall satisfaction with the course was at the highest level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".